Bake-off: Travel Routers


I’ve started traveling more and that means connecting to the Internet through less-trusted networks. Always nice to have another layer of security when doing more-risky things so I started looking for a good travel router. It is a confusing marketplace right now with some devices focusing on user features such as sharing files from a USB drive and a battery that can recharge your other devices, whereas others pack in more security options like firewalls and parental controls.

With so many choices (and some birthday money), I decided to get a couple of these devices and try to do an apples-to-apples bake-off.


For all of these network speed tests I used my laptop’s 802.11bgn adapter and visited from Google Chrome web browser. My baseline speed for my home network (not going through these travel routers) is:

  • 83.46 Mbps Download
  • 91.15 Mbps Upload


Below is a summary of my findings. If people/manufacturers want to send me other devices to examine/test, happy to add them to the matrix. The key to the colors is essentially: Green = Good, Yellow = OK, Red = Bad.

Travel Router Summary Matrix
Travel Router Summary Matrix




  1. Small and lightweight. Smaller than a credit card in height and length with a 1cm-ish width.
  2. Functional web interface with options arranged in a 1999-like UI (user interface).
  3. You can create up to 4 SSIDs (wireless networks) and VLANs too!
  4. Instruction page that came with it was pretty good.
  5. Firewall looked to have many good features.


  1. The device is powered via USB cable. If, as happened to me once or twice, the cable drops out of the device then you lose the Internet. It was annoying but the configuration of the device was persistent across power-drops.
  2. Cannot find the website for the manufacturer to get firmware updates and support. I did find a blog ( but it didn’t have the Mini Router that I bought as one of the products. There is but it is a shady site.


Speed – Best of 3 tests: 83.60 Down; 90.36 Up which are comparable to my normal network speeds

TP-Link TL-WR710N



  1. Very good web interface with excellent on-screen help and descriptions of the options.
  2. Great variety and depth of options to configure the device.
  3. USB storage/port for charging/sharing files.
  4. Parental controls for outbound traffic shaping.
  5. Firewall had many options.


  1. Speed performance was terrible; about half of what I got on the TIMETEC and normally.


Best of 3 tests: 41.48 Down; 52.95 Up this is 50% of what I normally get for downloads and 58% of my normal upload speed. To see if the performance impairment was in the firewall, I disabled it and reran the speed tests with the same results.

HooToo Tripmate Elite (HT-TM06)



  1. Two USB charging ports!
  2. Built-in 6000mAh battery for charging devices while on the go!
  3. Tech support (via email) was responsive with replies to my emails for help within 8 hours but their replies were confusing (language barrier).
  4. One USB port can be used to share files on the LAN.


  1. I had a horrible time trying to upgrade the firmware. The device kept saying “Wrong File Format”.
  2. The tech support people via email were not native English speakers and their emails were hard to understand.
  3. The web UI was underwhelming with more focus on icons and pictures then features and usability.
  4. No mention of or options for a firewall in the web UI.


Speed – Best of 3 tests: 63.62 Down; 85.33 Up. These speeds are a little over 75% what I normally get on my home network for downloads and about 94% of my upload speed.

Netgear Trek N300



  1. Like the hardware switch on the outer side of the device that allows for switching from WiFi to Wired Internet up-links.
  2. The Netgear is about the same size, shape and weight as the TP-link.
  3. After connecting to the device and it to the Internet, when I logged into the web UI it immediately notified me that a new firmware version was available and was extremely simple to update (just click a couple of buttons). This was a big contrast from the other devices that required me to find and download the latest versions of the firmware and then upload to the device.
  4. The web UI for configuration was smooth, professional and feature-rich. Just like what you’d see in other Netgear products.


  1. I cannot really find anything bad with this device.


Speed – Best of 3 tests: 84.60 Down; 87.30 Up which are comparable to my normal network speeds.

netis WF2403


  1. Small and lightweight. Smaller than a credit card in height and length with a 1cm-ish width.
  2. Very good web interface with many good options for security and functionality.
  3. Hardware switch on back of unit switches between AP/Router, AP and client modes
  4. Runs on USB power or outlet charger (included).
  5. My coworker found this in a clearance bin for $10. It is really good for $10 and even $26 which is what Amazon is selling it for.


  1. Discontinued product BUT was still very capable.
  2. Dropped up-stream connect to half-speed.


Speed – Best of 3 tests: 72.31 Down; 42.55 Up which are comparable to my normal network speeds for down but upstream is 50%.


There are many players in the travel router market right now. Some people are even opting to make their own devices using Raspberry Pi, Wifi Pineapples or other portable devices. Some buy the above devices and then flash them with OpenWRT or DDWRT to make them more flexible and open. It really is a “choose-your-own-adventure” experience. For me, I wanted something that “just works” and I’ll be able to rely on for many trips. I’m going to be using the Netgear device.

Comments are closed.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: